Most people who are hurt in a crash assume the hard part is over once the police report is filed. The other driver was clearly at fault. There is a citation, or a police officer's finding, or an obvious set of skid marks. The injuries are real and documented. Surely the insurance company will simply pay what the claim is worth. That is almost never how it goes.
Insurance adjusters are trained professionals whose job is to evaluate (and where possible, reduce) what the company pays out. That is not a criticism of any individual adjuster. It is a description of their role. A good adjuster will scrutinize your case. They will read every page of your medical records, compare dates, note what you did and did not say to each provider, and look for any explanation for your injuries other than the crash. Most injured people have no idea this is happening until they receive a letter denying or contesting part of their injury claim.
A Framingham Intersection Crash Shows How It Works
Consider a motor vehicle collision of a type that happens constantly in MetroWest: a driver traveling through a busy Framingham intersection turns left across oncoming traffic and strikes another vehicle who has the right of way. Framingham has no shortage of these intersections — Route 9 and Route 126, the Route 30 corridor, and the surface streets feeding them all produce left-turn collisions year after year.
On paper, that is about as clean a liability case as exists. The responding officer documents that the turning driver failed to yield. The accident victim sustains genuine orthopedic injuries requiring surgery. Anyone would call it straightforward.
The insurance carrier, however, called it something else. Over a single letter, the adjuster disputed whether one of the injuries was even caused by the crash, argued that the accident victim was partly to blame for the collision, and refused to credit his psychological injuries at all. Every one of those arguments was built out of details the injured person never thought twice about.
(1).png)
What Adjusters Actually Look For
Delays and gaps in your treatment
If you did not mention a particular body part at the emergency room, or waited several weeks before telling a doctor about it, expect that to be raised. Adjusters treat delay as evidence that the injury came from somewhere else.
In reality, delayed complaints are extremely common and clinically well understood. When someone is badly hurt in several places at once, the most painful injuries dominate the early visits. A less disabling injury often does not surface until the patient starts using that limb normally again. That is medicine, not fabrication — but you have to be prepared to explain it.
Anything at all in your prior medical history
Adjusters obtain years of past records and mine them for a pre-existing explanation. A prior complaint about the same region of the body, an unrelated benign condition, an old imaging study — any of it may be recast as the "real" cause of your current problem, whether or not the two have any medical connection.
Massachusetts law is on your side here. A defendant takes the injured person as he finds them and is responsible for aggravating a pre-existing condition that was not causing problems before the crash. But that principle only helps if someone raises it.
The specific words your own doctors wrote
This is the one that surprises people most. A single word in an operating report or an office note can become the entire basis for a denial. Surgeons and physicians write for other clinicians, not for insurance companies or juries, and they use shorthand that means one thing in a hospital and something very different to an adjuster looking for an argument.
A word describing how long a condition has been present, for example, is not a statement about what caused it — but it will be quoted back to you as though it were. Reading those records the way a defense expert would, and then reading them again for what they actually establish, is a large part of what a serious injury practice does.
Shared fault
Massachusetts is a modified comparative negligence state. If you are found more than 50 percent responsible you recover nothing, and any percentage of fault assigned to you of 50% or lower reduces your recovery proportionally. That gives carriers a powerful incentive to suggest that you were speeding, distracted, or not watching the road — often with no evidence at all beyond the suggestion itself.
Comparative negligence is an affirmative defense. The burden of proving it belongs to the party asserting it, not to you.
Emotional harm with no paper trail
Crashes leave psychological injuries as well as physical ones, and they often land hardest on people who have lost someone in a similar way before. Adjusters routinely discount these claims when there are no counseling or psychiatric records to point to.
Treatment records certainly strengthen a claim. But where someone has been physically injured through another's negligence, emotional distress and mental suffering are recoverable as ordinary elements of pain and suffering under Massachusetts law. There is no rule requiring a therapist's note as the price of admission.
Why a Clear Liability Case Still Needs to Be Built
The lesson of cases like the Framingham example is not that adjusters are dishonest. It is that "obvious" liability and a fair settlement are two different things. Fault addresses who caused the collision. Everything after that — which injuries are related, how much treatment was reasonable, what the harm is worth, whether you share blame — is contested territory, and it is where the money actually is.
An injured person handling a claim alone is usually unaware that any of this is in dispute until an offer arrives that is a fraction of what the case is worth. By then, statements have been given, authorizations have been signed, and the record has already taken shape.
How an Experienced Massachusetts Car Accident Attorney Can Help
An experienced Massachusetts personal injury attorney anticipates these arguments before the carrier makes them. That means obtaining and reading the complete medical record — not the summary, the whole file — and identifying the language that will be used against you. It means gathering the crash report, the officer's narrative and diagram, photographs, and witness accounts while they are still available. It means going back to your treating surgeon or physician for a narrative report that addresses causation directly and in plain terms, so the carrier is answering a doctor rather than an adjuster's interpretation of a doctor.
It also means knowing which arguments are legally serious, and which are posturing. A denial letter can sound authoritative and still be wrong on the law. Responding point by point, with the medicine and the statutes behind you, is frequently what moves a claim from a token offer to a full settlement — without anyone having to file suit.
At Pappas Law, LLC, we have spent more than twenty years handling injury claims for people across MetroWest, including Framingham, Natick, Ashland, Marlborough, and Wellesley. We know how these files are evaluated on the other side of the table, and we prepare every case as though it will be tried, because that is what produces fair results.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does a gap in treatment hurt my Massachusetts car accident claim?
It gives the insurance company an argument, but it does not end your claim. Delayed symptoms are common when someone has multiple injuries, and the delay can usually be explained through your medical records and your treating providers.
Can an insurance company use my medical history against me?
They will review it and look for pre-existing conditions. Under Massachusetts law, however, a negligent driver is liable for aggravating a condition that was not causing you problems before the crash.
Do I need counseling records to claim emotional distress?
No. Where you have been physically injured by someone else's negligence, emotional distress is part of your pain and suffering damages. Treatment records help, but they are not a prerequisite.
The police report blames the other driver. Isn't that enough?
It is important evidence and adjusters weigh it heavily, but it does not resolve the disputes that follow — which injuries are related to the crash, and what the claim is worth. Insurers frequently accept fault while contesting causation and damages.
How long do I have to file a car accident claim in Massachusetts?
Generally, you have three years from the date of the crash to either settle your injury claim or file a personal injury lawsuit to protect your rights. Shorter deadlines can apply in certain situations, so speak with an attorney promptly rather than waiting.
